The following discussion has been moved from the page User talk:Metaknowledge. This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions. You mentioned a year ago about a bot for these Spanish adjectives.
You said that your bot "clunking thing" could process them. Is that option still there? I'm not allowed to run a bot anymore, sadly. At least, only if I run it very slowly. Could you take a look at this and see if you can make sense out of it? The definition as stands now is totally useless due to completely obsolete 19th-century terminology. There are a few Google Books hits for the terms used, but you have to know enough biology to read between the lines and figure out what they're referring to in modern terms- and my high-school biology from 40 years ago doesn't cut it.
You're right. I'll be more careful in my next edits. Sorry about the confusion on the vote. I thought it was still open. I didn't look at the date until you just reverted it. Reguyla talk , 1 March UTC. Thank you for your edit. I'm from burma. My nationality is Myanmar. Government says Myanmar is not the name of a nationality.
But it isn't true. There is not a language called Burmese. The word Burma belongs to many nationalities. Those nationalities have their own languages. A man created a word that belongs to nationalities in my country.
That word is Burma. Nay Win,dictator,wanted to erase people's memories about great leaders. That man was a great leader of my country. So,everything about him was deleted. But the word burma can't be deleted. So,Nay Win maked people believed that Burma belongs to only one nationality.
